We count visits with Google Analytics cookies and Vercel Web Analytics to see which pages help readers most.

Cookie settings
The Assurance Desk

What does the EU AI Act ask of a UK business?

Some of its rules already apply, and your role decides which ones reach your firm.

The EU AI Act can apply to a UK business, whether it builds AI or only uses it. It covers firms that put AI on the EU market from anywhere. It also covers firms outside the EU whose AI output is used there. What it asks depends on your role and on the kind of AI.

Contents
  1. In this series
  2. Does the EU AI Act apply to a UK business?
  3. Provider or deployer: which one is your firm?
  4. Which risk level is your AI in?
  5. Do you have to label AI-generated content?
  6. UK company with no EU office: what do you need?
  7. EU AI Act timeline: the key dates
  8. What did AI engines cite on the EU AI Act?
  9. What to do
  10. Common questions
  11. Sources

Does the EU AI Act apply to a UK business?

The EU AI Act can apply to a UK business, even with no office in the EU. It covers firms that put AI systems or general-purpose AI models on the EU market, wherever they are based. It also covers firms outside the EU whose AI output is used in the EU, whether they build AI or only use it.

Firms based in the EU that use AI are covered as well.

The UK government makes the same point for general-purpose AI. A UK provider of a general-purpose AI system will need to comply with the EU AI Act to access the EU market.

Does the EU AI Act reach your firm?

Is any of these true for your firm?

  • You put AI on the EU market For example: You sell an AI system or model to customers in the EU, from anywhere
  • or Your AI's output is used in the EU For example: Your team in the UK uses an AI tool, and a client in the EU uses the result
  • or You use AI from a base in the EU For example: Part of your group is based in the EU and uses AI at work

The Act can apply to you. Your role decides what it asks.

Provider or deployer: which one is your firm?

Under the EU AI Act, your firm is a provider if it develops an AI system or a general-purpose AI model, or has one developed, and places it on the market. Your firm is a deployer if it uses an AI system under its own authority. Only personal use outside work is left out.

So if your staff use tools such as ChatGPT or Copilot at work, your firm is a deployer. The Act reaches you if you are based in the EU, or if the output is used in the EU.

One firm can be both. If you sell your own AI tool, you are its provider. If your staff use other AI tools at work, you are their deployer.

Some set-ups are harder to place. Eduardo Ustaran is global co-head of the privacy and cybersecurity practice at the law firm Hogan Lovells Cadwalader. In August 2026 he wrote that AI agents built on different kinds of underlying model, such as closed source, open weight and a firm's own models, create “a significant compliance complication”, because each kind of model “attracts its own regulatory consequences”.

Both roles share one duty. Providers and deployers must take steps to support the AI literacy of their staff, and of others who use AI for them. The law sets no fixed level for any one person.

The roles in the EU AI Act

  • Provider Develops an AI system or model, or has one developed, and places it on the market A software firm that sells an AI tool for screening job applications
  • Deployer Uses an AI system at work, under its own authority A firm whose staff use ChatGPT or Copilot

This obligation does not require providers or deployers to guarantee any specific level of AI literacy of any individual.

Which risk level is your AI in?

The EU AI Act sorts AI by risk, and your AI's level depends on what it does. Banned practices sit at the top, then high-risk AI, such as hiring tools, then AI with transparency duties, such as chatbots. All other AI sits under the AI literacy duty. The Digital Omnibus on AI kept this risk-based approach.

The banned practices include AI that uses subliminal, manipulative or deceptive techniques to distort how people behave. They also include AI that makes realistic intimate or sexually explicit images or videos of an identifiable person without their consent.

AI systems listed in Annex III count as high-risk. That list includes AI used to recruit or select people, such as tools that filter job applications and evaluate candidates.

If you use a high-risk system, you must give human oversight to people with the right competence, training and authority.

The labelling section below explains the transparency duties.

The risk levels in the EU AI Act
LevelWhat it coversWhat the Act asksFrom
Banned practicesAI that uses manipulative or deceptive techniques to distort behaviour, and AI that makes intimate images of a person without consentDo not use it or put it on the market2 February 2025, with some new bans from 2 December 2026
High-riskAI listed in Annex III, such as hiring tools, and AI covered by the product laws in Annex IThe high-risk rules. Deployers must give human oversight to people with the right competence, training and authority2 December 2027 for Annex III, and 2 August 2028 for Annex I
Transparency dutiesAI that talks to people, and AI that makes audio, images, video or textTell people they are dealing with AI, mark AI output, and disclose deep fakes2 August 2026
Everything elseAll other AISupport the AI literacy of the staff who use it2 February 2025

Do you have to label AI-generated content?

Some AI-generated content must be marked or disclosed under the EU AI Act, and your role decides who does it. Providers of tools that make synthetic audio, images, video or text must mark the output so a machine can detect it as AI-made. Deployers who make a deep fake with AI must disclose that AI generated or changed it.

Providers of AI that talks to people, such as chatbots, must make sure people are told it is AI. This does not apply where that is obvious.

Content tools already on the market before 2 August 2026 have until 2 December 2026 to meet the marking duty.

What about the UK? The UK government says the UK does not currently regulate how AI-generated content is labelled.

Who labels what under the EU AI Act

Provider (builds or sells the AI)

  • Tell people they are talking to AI, unless it is obvious
  • Mark AI-made audio, images, video and text so a machine can detect it

Deployer (uses the AI)

  • Disclose that a deep fake was generated or changed by AI

UK company with no EU office: what do you need?

A UK company with no EU office needs an authorised representative in the EU if it provides a high-risk AI system or a general-purpose AI model to the EU market. The representative must be appointed by written mandate before the system is made available, or the model placed on the market, and must be established in the EU.

Both duties fall on providers. A firm that only uses AI tools is a deployer, and its duties are set out above.

Prior to making their high-risk AI systems available on the Union market, providers established in third countries shall, by written mandate, appoint an authorised representative which is established in the Union.

EU AI Act timeline: the key dates

The EU AI Act applies in stages, and its main start date was 2 August 2026. AI literacy and the banned practices came first, on 2 February 2025, and the rules for general-purpose AI models followed on 2 August 2025. The high-risk rules come last, from 2 December 2027.

The law was amended this year. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of 8 July 2026, the Digital Omnibus on AI, entered into force on 27 July 2026. It kept the Act's structure and its risk-based approach.

Not every expert wanted the Act changed. In June 2026, before the changes were agreed, Sandra Wachter, Humboldt Professor of Technology and Regulation at the Hasso Plattner Institute in Germany, argued against weakening it.

The next date is 2 December 2026. Some new bans start then. Content tools already on the market before 2 August 2026 must meet the marking duty by the same day.

For AI listed in Annex III, such as hiring tools, the high-risk rules apply from 2 December 2027. For AI covered by the product laws in Annex I, they apply from 2 August 2028.

For each date, and what changed in July 2026, see the EU AI Act timeline.

The EU AI Act, date by date

  1. 2 February 2025EU AI literacy and the banned practices apply
  2. 2 August 2025EU Rules for general-purpose AI models apply
  3. 27 July 2026EU The Digital Omnibus on AI, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, enters into force
  4. 2 August 2026EU The Act applies in general
  5. 2 December 2026EU Some new bans apply, and content tools already on the market must meet the marking duty
  6. 2 December 2027EU High-risk rules for AI listed in Annex III, such as hiring tools
  7. 2 August 2028EU High-risk rules for AI covered by the product laws in Annex I

The geopolitical pressures risk watering down the AI Act with serious consequences for the economy at large. Geopolitics might have changed, but the harms of AI have not.

What did AI engines cite on the EU AI Act?

AI engines cited one official source in 111 when we asked about the EU AI Act: the European Commission's AI Act Service Desk, cited once, by Perplexity. We asked six AI engines two questions a UK buyer might type, on 18 September 2026, from the UK, with web search on. The 12 answers cited 111 sources from 69 websites.

This was one run on one day, and AI answers change from day to day.

The full results are in our research note. For what the law asks of you, start with the Act and the Commission's AI Act Service Desk.

Official sources were rare in this set of answers

Cited links

  • Government or regulator 1
  • Other sources 110
Chart values
Official sources were rare in this set of answers
MeasureCited links
Government or regulator1
Other sources110
111 cited links across 12 answers to two EU AI Act questions, six engines, UK, 18 September 2026. Repeated links count each time. One run, not a measure of answer accuracy.

What to do

  1. Work out your role for each AI tool: provider, deployer, or both.
  2. Check whether your AI, or its output, is used in the EU.
  3. Check each tool against the banned practices and the high-risk list in Annex III.
  4. Support the AI literacy of the staff who use AI for you.
  5. Providers of high-risk AI or general-purpose AI models from outside the EU need an authorised representative in the EU first.
  6. Note the next dates: 2 December 2026, then 2 December 2027 for high-risk AI in Annex III.

Common questions

We only use ChatGPT or Copilot. Does the EU AI Act apply to us?

It can. Using an AI tool at work makes your firm a deployer. The Act covers deployers based in the EU, and deployers outside it when the output is used in the EU. If it covers you, the AI literacy duty applies, and so does the duty to disclose any deep fakes you make.

Are AI hiring tools high-risk under the EU AI Act?

Yes, when they are used to recruit or select people. Annex III lists AI that filters job applications and evaluates candidates, and AI in Annex III counts as high-risk. Those rules apply from 2 December 2027.

What are the fines under the EU AI Act?

The highest fines are for the banned practices: up to 35 million euros or 7% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher. Most other duties carry fines of up to 15 million euros or 3% of worldwide annual turnover. That includes the duties of deployers and the transparency duties.

Is there a UK AI Act?

No. The UK has no AI Act. AI is covered by the laws that already apply, through the regulators that already exist. The UK steps covered here are narrower than the EU AI Act. UK regulations made on 16 April 2026 require the UK's data protection regulator to prepare a code of practice. It will cover personal data in developing and using AI, and in automated decision-making. Those regulations came into force on 12 May 2026. The UK government also says the UK does not currently regulate how AI-generated content is labelled. See how the UK regulates AI.

Where next

Sources

  1. EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (Artificial Intelligence Act), consolidated text of 27 July 2026, checked 2 October 2026
  2. EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024, checked 2 October 2026
  3. EUR-Lex, Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 July 2026, checked 2 October 2026
  4. IAPP, Rewriting the rules of AI: Targeted EU AI Act amendments in the Digital Omnibus on AI, checked 2 October 2026
  5. Sandra Wachter, Humboldt Professor at the Hasso Plattner Institute, on Bluesky, 19 June 2026, checked 5 October 2026
  6. The Assurance Desk: AI answers on the EU AI Act, measured 18 September 2026 (data file), checked 2 October 2026
  7. GOV.UK, Report on Copyright and Artificial Intelligence, checked 2 October 2026
  8. legislation.gov.uk, The Data Protection Act 2018 (Code of Practice on Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision-Making) Regulations 2026, checked 2 October 2026
  9. Eduardo Ustaran on LinkedIn, 20 August 2026, checked 5 October 2026
  10. Hogan Lovells Cadwalader, Eduardo Ustaran, checked 5 October 2026
  11. Hasso Plattner Institute, Two new professors for the HPI, 3 March 2025, checked 5 October 2026
  12. GOV.UK, A pro-innovation approach to AI regulation: government response, checked 2 October 2026

This is an independent editorial guide, not legal advice.